कई दिनों से देख रहा हूँ, कि कुछ साथी किसी सरिता शुक्ला नाम से डाले हुए case को ऐसे उछाल रहे हैं,
जैसे की भूचाल आ गया हो ????? ये उन्हीं लोगों द्वारा चयनित लोगों को गुमराह किया जा रहा है , जो खुद को कोर्ट का बहुत बड़ा अधिवक्ता समझते हैं, और कुछ तो चोर ऐसे हैं जो किसी और की करतूत को अपने सर ऐसे लइ रहें हैं, जैसे कहीं पर बम विस्फोट करके कोई भी आतंकवादी संघठन अपना कृत्य बताता है !
तो आइये इस case का Postmortem करते हैं,
पहले जानते हैं क्या है ये case जो hon. C.J बेंच में 26 अक्टूबर को 12 न0 पर as a fresh case लगा हुआ है ,
12.WRIC -59942/2015 SARITA SHUKLA AGNIHOTRI KUMAR TRIPATHI
ANIL KUMAR SINGH
Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS C.S.C.
U.S. UPADHYAY
District-ALLAHABAD D.O.F. 15/10/2015
Main Category : 200000
Special Appeals( Special Appeals)
Category : 200007 Against final order of Single Judge in Writ Petition
इस case में single बेंच के इस आदेश को चुनौती दी गयी है,
Single बेंच में Writ A 48620/2015 जो की सरिता शुक्ला द्वारा टेट 2011 के पूरे
( प्राथमिक एवं उच्चप्राथमिक स्तर ) परिणाम को रद्द करने के लिए ही डाली गयी थी,
जिस पर 8 अक्टूबर को hon. Single judge Amit जी ने 4 माह में केवल जांच का आदेश दिया था,
और इनकी याचिका निस्तारित कर दी थी !
सरकारी वकील ने उस्मानी कमेटी की रिपोर्ट को कोर्ट में पेश किया,
और बताया की किस तरह से प्रश्नों के उत्तर संशोधित होने पर परिणाम भी संशोधित हुआ !
कुछ ऐसे अभ्यर्थियों को भी इस याचिका में बताया गया है कि ये टेट परीक्षा में अनुपस्थित थे लेकिन बाद मइ ऑनलाइन हुए result में इनको पास दिखाया गया है !
तो इस सब पर hon. Judge ने प्रमुख सचिव बेसिक शिक्षा को पूरे मामले की 4 महीने में जांच करके कोर्ट में रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत करने को कहा है !
अब ये चाहते हैं कि hon. C.J sir इस आदेश को बदलकर या तो टेट परिणाम रद्द कर दें या फिर मौलिक नियुक्ति जांच होने टीक रोक दें !
Single बेंच का आदेश ------
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48620 of 2015
Petitioner :- Sarita Shukla And 2 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi,Anil Singh Bishen
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard Sri Radha Kant Ojha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Agnihotri
Kumar Tripathi for the petitioners and Sri Mata Prasad, learned Additional
Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
Petitioners are seeking quashing of the result dated
25.11.2011, 30.11.2011 and 29.1.2015.
Further prayer is for a direction to the respondents to decrease
the marks of those candidates whose marks have been increased by six marks.
It has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that an
enquiry in the matter regarding irregularities in the selection in question was
ordered and an enquiry report has been submitted by the Chief Secretary
dated 10.4.2012 in which wide scale irregularities have been reported.
With regard to marks it is submitted that in the report submitted by the
Enquiry Committee headed by the Principal Secretary dated 10.4.2012 five
questions in the Madhya Prathmik Star Pariksha, eight questions in the the
Ucch Prathmik Star (Science) seven questions Ucch Prathmik Star (Arts) have
been changed.
It is also submitted that in the A series of the Prathmik as well
as Ucch Prathmik Star question paper 11 questions have been changed. In
para-11 of the report it is mentioned that six questions in the Prathmik Star
Pariksha, eight questions in the Uchh Prathmik Star Pariksha, two questions
in the Prathmik Star Pariksha (Urdu) are also wrong.
In para 22-c of the writ petition it is alleged that in the result of the T.E.T.
2011 issued on 29.1.2015 there are candidates, whose names are mentioned in
the list, who were not allotted any roll number.
Their name has been shown
who were about 1096 in number. In para 22-e a list of other candidates has
been mentioned who have been shown Absent in the result declared on
25.11.2011 but their names have been shown as qualified in the TET
Examination-2011.
This list consists of about 68 names.
This writ petition is therefore disposed of at the admission stage itself with the
consent of learned counsel for the parties with a direction to the respondent
no.1,
Principal Secretary (Basic Education), Shiksha, U.P. Lucknow to
scrutinize and examine all the OMR/Answer Sheets and also identify those
cases where it has come on record that the result of even those candidates
have been declared who have never appeared in the examinations.
This exercise shall be completed within a period of four months from the date a
certified copy of this order is received in his office.
Order Date :- 8.10.2015/Asha
सरकारी नौकरी - Army /Bank /CPSU /Defence /Faculty /Non-teaching /Police /PSC /Special recruitment drive /SSC /Stenographer /Teaching Jobs /Trainee / UPSC
जैसे की भूचाल आ गया हो ????? ये उन्हीं लोगों द्वारा चयनित लोगों को गुमराह किया जा रहा है , जो खुद को कोर्ट का बहुत बड़ा अधिवक्ता समझते हैं, और कुछ तो चोर ऐसे हैं जो किसी और की करतूत को अपने सर ऐसे लइ रहें हैं, जैसे कहीं पर बम विस्फोट करके कोई भी आतंकवादी संघठन अपना कृत्य बताता है !
तो आइये इस case का Postmortem करते हैं,
पहले जानते हैं क्या है ये case जो hon. C.J बेंच में 26 अक्टूबर को 12 न0 पर as a fresh case लगा हुआ है ,
12.WRIC -59942/2015 SARITA SHUKLA AGNIHOTRI KUMAR TRIPATHI
ANIL KUMAR SINGH
Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS C.S.C.
U.S. UPADHYAY
District-ALLAHABAD D.O.F. 15/10/2015
Main Category : 200000
Special Appeals( Special Appeals)
Category : 200007 Against final order of Single Judge in Writ Petition
इस case में single बेंच के इस आदेश को चुनौती दी गयी है,
Single बेंच में Writ A 48620/2015 जो की सरिता शुक्ला द्वारा टेट 2011 के पूरे
( प्राथमिक एवं उच्चप्राथमिक स्तर ) परिणाम को रद्द करने के लिए ही डाली गयी थी,
जिस पर 8 अक्टूबर को hon. Single judge Amit जी ने 4 माह में केवल जांच का आदेश दिया था,
और इनकी याचिका निस्तारित कर दी थी !
सरकारी वकील ने उस्मानी कमेटी की रिपोर्ट को कोर्ट में पेश किया,
और बताया की किस तरह से प्रश्नों के उत्तर संशोधित होने पर परिणाम भी संशोधित हुआ !
कुछ ऐसे अभ्यर्थियों को भी इस याचिका में बताया गया है कि ये टेट परीक्षा में अनुपस्थित थे लेकिन बाद मइ ऑनलाइन हुए result में इनको पास दिखाया गया है !
तो इस सब पर hon. Judge ने प्रमुख सचिव बेसिक शिक्षा को पूरे मामले की 4 महीने में जांच करके कोर्ट में रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत करने को कहा है !
अब ये चाहते हैं कि hon. C.J sir इस आदेश को बदलकर या तो टेट परिणाम रद्द कर दें या फिर मौलिक नियुक्ति जांच होने टीक रोक दें !
Single बेंच का आदेश ------
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48620 of 2015
Petitioner :- Sarita Shukla And 2 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi,Anil Singh Bishen
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard Sri Radha Kant Ojha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Agnihotri
Kumar Tripathi for the petitioners and Sri Mata Prasad, learned Additional
Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
Petitioners are seeking quashing of the result dated
25.11.2011, 30.11.2011 and 29.1.2015.
Further prayer is for a direction to the respondents to decrease
the marks of those candidates whose marks have been increased by six marks.
It has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that an
enquiry in the matter regarding irregularities in the selection in question was
ordered and an enquiry report has been submitted by the Chief Secretary
dated 10.4.2012 in which wide scale irregularities have been reported.
With regard to marks it is submitted that in the report submitted by the
Enquiry Committee headed by the Principal Secretary dated 10.4.2012 five
questions in the Madhya Prathmik Star Pariksha, eight questions in the the
Ucch Prathmik Star (Science) seven questions Ucch Prathmik Star (Arts) have
been changed.
It is also submitted that in the A series of the Prathmik as well
as Ucch Prathmik Star question paper 11 questions have been changed. In
para-11 of the report it is mentioned that six questions in the Prathmik Star
Pariksha, eight questions in the Uchh Prathmik Star Pariksha, two questions
in the Prathmik Star Pariksha (Urdu) are also wrong.
In para 22-c of the writ petition it is alleged that in the result of the T.E.T.
2011 issued on 29.1.2015 there are candidates, whose names are mentioned in
the list, who were not allotted any roll number.
Their name has been shown
who were about 1096 in number. In para 22-e a list of other candidates has
been mentioned who have been shown Absent in the result declared on
25.11.2011 but their names have been shown as qualified in the TET
Examination-2011.
This list consists of about 68 names.
This writ petition is therefore disposed of at the admission stage itself with the
consent of learned counsel for the parties with a direction to the respondent
no.1,
Principal Secretary (Basic Education), Shiksha, U.P. Lucknow to
scrutinize and examine all the OMR/Answer Sheets and also identify those
cases where it has come on record that the result of even those candidates
have been declared who have never appeared in the examinations.
This exercise shall be completed within a period of four months from the date a
certified copy of this order is received in his office.
Order Date :- 8.10.2015/Asha
सरकारी नौकरी - Army /Bank /CPSU /Defence /Faculty /Non-teaching /Police /PSC /Special recruitment drive /SSC /Stenographer /Teaching Jobs /Trainee / UPSC