🔵 बीटीसी/बीएड प्रशिक्षण परीक्षा का अंतिम परिणाम घोषित होने से पहले टेट परीक्षा उत्तीर्ण करने वालों का टेट सर्टिफिकेट अवैध घोषित
🔵 अवैध टेट सर्टिफिकेट से सहायक अध्यापक बनने वाले अभ्यर्थियों को सुनवाई का मौका देते हुए आवश्यक कार्यवाही किये जाने हेतु समस्त बीएसए को आदेश
🔵 बिना विज्ञान-गणित विषय के स्नातक उत्तीर्ण करने वाले सहायक अध्यापकों को जनपदवार खोजकर आवश्यक कार्यवाही हेतु भी याचिकाकर्ता के स्थान पर बीएसए को कार्यवाही करने का आदेश
Another submission advanced by the learned counsel for the appellants is with regard to the nature of the directions that have issued.
It is the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants that a duty has been cast upon the petitioners to challenge the appointments not made in conformity with Clause 5(ii) before the District Basic Education Officer. The contention is that it is the duty of the District Basic Education Officer to examine all such appointments and determine whether the appointments of Assistant Teachers was in accordance with the eligibility requirement contained in Clause 5(ii) of the notification dated 11 February 2011, since, it would not be possible for the petitioners to actually find out the names of the Assistant Teachers who had been appointed de-hors the provisions contained in Clause 5(ii) of the Notification. This submission has also been made in connection with the directions issued by the learned Judge with regard to the persons who have passed graduation without Science or Mathematics as one of the subjects. It should, in our opinion, not be left to the writ petitioners to find the out the names of such persons. It is the District Basic Education Officer who should carry out the exercise. Of course, as indicated in the impugned judgement, the appointments of persons who are not eligible but who appeared in the TET examination should be cancelled after providing an opportunity to such persons.
The judgement and order impugned in the Special Appeals is, accordingly, modified to the extent indicated above and the Special Appeals are disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.5.2018
A. V. Singh
(Dilip Gupta,J.)
🔵 अवैध टेट सर्टिफिकेट से सहायक अध्यापक बनने वाले अभ्यर्थियों को सुनवाई का मौका देते हुए आवश्यक कार्यवाही किये जाने हेतु समस्त बीएसए को आदेश
🔵 बिना विज्ञान-गणित विषय के स्नातक उत्तीर्ण करने वाले सहायक अध्यापकों को जनपदवार खोजकर आवश्यक कार्यवाही हेतु भी याचिकाकर्ता के स्थान पर बीएसए को कार्यवाही करने का आदेश
Another submission advanced by the learned counsel for the appellants is with regard to the nature of the directions that have issued.
It is the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants that a duty has been cast upon the petitioners to challenge the appointments not made in conformity with Clause 5(ii) before the District Basic Education Officer. The contention is that it is the duty of the District Basic Education Officer to examine all such appointments and determine whether the appointments of Assistant Teachers was in accordance with the eligibility requirement contained in Clause 5(ii) of the notification dated 11 February 2011, since, it would not be possible for the petitioners to actually find out the names of the Assistant Teachers who had been appointed de-hors the provisions contained in Clause 5(ii) of the Notification. This submission has also been made in connection with the directions issued by the learned Judge with regard to the persons who have passed graduation without Science or Mathematics as one of the subjects. It should, in our opinion, not be left to the writ petitioners to find the out the names of such persons. It is the District Basic Education Officer who should carry out the exercise. Of course, as indicated in the impugned judgement, the appointments of persons who are not eligible but who appeared in the TET examination should be cancelled after providing an opportunity to such persons.
The judgement and order impugned in the Special Appeals is, accordingly, modified to the extent indicated above and the Special Appeals are disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.5.2018
A. V. Singh
(Dilip Gupta,J.)
(Jayant Banerji,J.)
