शिक्षा मित्रों के समायोजन मामले में सख्त रुख अपनाते हुए हाईकोर्ट की लखनऊ खंडपीठ ने बीएसए को किया तलब, कहा क्यों न बीएसए के खिलाफ अदालत के आदेश की अवमानना की हो कार्रवाई
Court No. - 8
Case :- CONTEMPT No. - 2283 of 2016
Applicant :- Avinash Chandra Awasthi & Anr.
Opposite Party :- Praveen Mani Tripathi Distt. Basic Education Officer Lko.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vinay Misra
Hon'ble Dr. Devendra Kumar Arora,J.
Heard.�
Petitioner is alleging willful non-compliance of the order dated 29.09.2016 passed in writ petition No. 23676 (S/S) of 2016 : Avinash Chandra Awasthi and another Vs. State of U.P. Thru Secy. Basic Education Govt. of U.P. and others.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that copy of the order of the writ Court along with fresh representation has been served to the opposite party personally on 13.10.2016 but no positive steps have been taken till date and the period prescribed by the writ court has expired much earlier, therefore, the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court by means of the present contempt petition, seeking appropriate action under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act against the opposite party for willful non compliance of the order of the writ Court.
On due consideration and perusal of record, prima facie, a case for willful disobedience of the order of the writ Court is made out.
Issue notice to opposite party fixing 16.01.2017.
On that date, opposite party shall appear in person before this court to show cause as to why proceedings under the Contempt of Court may not be initiated for willful disobedience of the aforesaid order.
It is clarified that if the order of the writ court is complied with in its true spirit before the date fixed, the opposite party need not appear on the date fixed and shall file only an affidavit of compliance of the order.
Counsel for the petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the petition to Standing Counsel, who shall transmit the same to the opposite party along with gist of order at the earliest for information and compliance.
List on 16.01.2017.
Order Date :- 7.12.2016
Rahul
sponsored links:
ख़बरें अब तक - 72825 प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों की भर्ती - Today's Headlines
- सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कहा- अस्थाई कर्मचरियों को भी मिले स्थाई के बराबर सैलरी
- TET/CTET कक्षा 1 से 8 तक के स्कूलों में शिक्षक पद पर नियुक्त होने की योग्यता मात्र है इसके अंकों के आधार पर शिक्षकों को नियुक्त करने के लिए राज्य/केंद्र सरकार बाध्य नही
- हाईकोर्ट के निर्णय की सम्पूर्ण विवेचना: गणेश शंकर दीक्षित, टीईटी संघर्ष मोर्चा ,उ.प्र.की जुबानी
- सुल्तानपुर : 72825 शिक्षक भर्ती मामला : 14 काउंसिलिंग के बाद भी 178 शिक्षकों के पद खाली,पढ़ें पूरी खबर
- विशुद्ध राजनीति : शिक्षकों की राजनीति - स्कूल से सियासत तक मास्टर,क्लिक कर पढ़ें पूरी खबर
Court No. - 8
Case :- CONTEMPT No. - 2283 of 2016
Applicant :- Avinash Chandra Awasthi & Anr.
Opposite Party :- Praveen Mani Tripathi Distt. Basic Education Officer Lko.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vinay Misra
Hon'ble Dr. Devendra Kumar Arora,J.
Heard.�
Petitioner is alleging willful non-compliance of the order dated 29.09.2016 passed in writ petition No. 23676 (S/S) of 2016 : Avinash Chandra Awasthi and another Vs. State of U.P. Thru Secy. Basic Education Govt. of U.P. and others.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that copy of the order of the writ Court along with fresh representation has been served to the opposite party personally on 13.10.2016 but no positive steps have been taken till date and the period prescribed by the writ court has expired much earlier, therefore, the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court by means of the present contempt petition, seeking appropriate action under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act against the opposite party for willful non compliance of the order of the writ Court.
On due consideration and perusal of record, prima facie, a case for willful disobedience of the order of the writ Court is made out.
Issue notice to opposite party fixing 16.01.2017.
On that date, opposite party shall appear in person before this court to show cause as to why proceedings under the Contempt of Court may not be initiated for willful disobedience of the aforesaid order.
It is clarified that if the order of the writ court is complied with in its true spirit before the date fixed, the opposite party need not appear on the date fixed and shall file only an affidavit of compliance of the order.
Counsel for the petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the petition to Standing Counsel, who shall transmit the same to the opposite party along with gist of order at the earliest for information and compliance.
List on 16.01.2017.
Order Date :- 7.12.2016
Rahul
- उत्तर प्रदेश में RTE एक्ट 2009 के अनुपालन कराये जाने के सम्बन्ध में माननीय विधायक को सौंपा ज्ञापन: बीएड/टेट उत्तीर्ण संघर्ष मोर्चा
- UPTET: टीईटी संघर्ष मोर्चा ने बैठक कर बनाई रणनीति
- शिक्षामित्रों ने भारी हुंकार, वहीँ दूसरी तरफ 15000 व 16448 भर्ती में चयनित शिक्षकों हाईकोर्ट के आदेश पर की चर्चा और सुप्रीमकोर्ट की बनाई रणनीति
- लैपटॉप वितरण की मेरिट कटऑफ जारी, इनको मिल सकेगा लैपटॉप
- मानक के अनुसार तैनात किए जाएंगे शिक्षक
- टीईटी पास छात्रों ने शिक्षक भर्ती में मौका देने के मांग की
sponsored links:
ख़बरें अब तक - 72825 प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों की भर्ती - Today's Headlines