प्राइवेट 2012 का आदेस जारी हो गया 15000 भर्ती मे सामिल होने के लिए--
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 59443 of 2015
Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Maurya & 2 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 5 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Khare
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhanu Pratap Singh,Santosh Kumar
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
The petitioners are three in number. They are candidates for the appointment as Assistant Teachers. They are aggrieved by the order dated 10th October, 2015 issued by the third respondent, whereby he excluded the petitioners from the zone of consideration.�
It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that vide Government Order dated 09th December, 2014 a decision has been taken for the recruitment of 15000 Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools. In the said Government Order, a detail schedule has been provided and the last date for submission of the forms was fixed as 05th March, 2015.
It is stated that the petitioners have passed their two year regular BTC Course and they have also cleared U.P. Teachers Eligibility Test (Primary Level), thus they are qualified for the appointment on the posts of Assistant Teacher (Primary School).
It is further contended on behalf of the petitioners that the last date was extended twice by the respondents. It is submitted that second time the last date was extended for those candidates who have obtained the Diploma in Education (Special Education). The respondents have again, third time, extended the last date in respect of the candidates who were within the permissible age limit as on 1.7.2015 and who have passed Special BTC 2004, 2007 and 2008. The further direction has been issued for rejection of remaining candidates. Consequent upon the said directions, the petitioners shall be excluded from the zone of consideration.
It is stated that the petitioners' names find place in the mother list prepared by the respondents as they have submitted their forms before the last date i.e. 11th September, 2015.
Learned Counsel for the third respondent Sri B.P. Singh was granted time to seek instructions to verify the said fact. On the basis of instructions, he submits that it is true that the petitioners' names are in the mother list.
Learned Counsel for the respondents may file counter affidavit within six weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
List after expiry of the said period.
In view of the said submission the petitioners are allowed to participate in the ensuing counselling, however, if they are selected, their appointment shall abide by the result of this writ petition.
Having regard to the facts of the case, I find that in the interest of justice, a general direction be issued upon the respondents as under:
(i) The similarly placed persons whose names are in the mother list, shall be allowed provisionally to participate in the counselling; and,
(ii) In case they are selected, in their appointment letters it would be clearly mentioned that their appointments shall be subject to the result of this writ petition.�
The above general direction is issued with a view to save the invaluable time of this Court from spate of the writ petitions on the similar grounds.
Order Date :- 15.10.2015
सरकारी नौकरी - Army /Bank /CPSU /Defence /Faculty /Non-teaching /Police /PSC /Special recruitment drive /SSC /Stenographer /Teaching Jobs /Trainee / UPSC
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 59443 of 2015
Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Maurya & 2 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 5 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Khare
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhanu Pratap Singh,Santosh Kumar
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
The petitioners are three in number. They are candidates for the appointment as Assistant Teachers. They are aggrieved by the order dated 10th October, 2015 issued by the third respondent, whereby he excluded the petitioners from the zone of consideration.�
It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that vide Government Order dated 09th December, 2014 a decision has been taken for the recruitment of 15000 Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools. In the said Government Order, a detail schedule has been provided and the last date for submission of the forms was fixed as 05th March, 2015.
It is stated that the petitioners have passed their two year regular BTC Course and they have also cleared U.P. Teachers Eligibility Test (Primary Level), thus they are qualified for the appointment on the posts of Assistant Teacher (Primary School).
It is further contended on behalf of the petitioners that the last date was extended twice by the respondents. It is submitted that second time the last date was extended for those candidates who have obtained the Diploma in Education (Special Education). The respondents have again, third time, extended the last date in respect of the candidates who were within the permissible age limit as on 1.7.2015 and who have passed Special BTC 2004, 2007 and 2008. The further direction has been issued for rejection of remaining candidates. Consequent upon the said directions, the petitioners shall be excluded from the zone of consideration.
It is stated that the petitioners' names find place in the mother list prepared by the respondents as they have submitted their forms before the last date i.e. 11th September, 2015.
Learned Counsel for the third respondent Sri B.P. Singh was granted time to seek instructions to verify the said fact. On the basis of instructions, he submits that it is true that the petitioners' names are in the mother list.
Learned Counsel for the respondents may file counter affidavit within six weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
List after expiry of the said period.
In view of the said submission the petitioners are allowed to participate in the ensuing counselling, however, if they are selected, their appointment shall abide by the result of this writ petition.
Having regard to the facts of the case, I find that in the interest of justice, a general direction be issued upon the respondents as under:
(i) The similarly placed persons whose names are in the mother list, shall be allowed provisionally to participate in the counselling; and,
(ii) In case they are selected, in their appointment letters it would be clearly mentioned that their appointments shall be subject to the result of this writ petition.�
The above general direction is issued with a view to save the invaluable time of this Court from spate of the writ petitions on the similar grounds.
Order Date :- 15.10.2015
सरकारी नौकरी - Army /Bank /CPSU /Defence /Faculty /Non-teaching /Police /PSC /Special recruitment drive /SSC /Stenographer /Teaching Jobs /Trainee / UPSC