12460 सहायक अध्यापकों की भर्ती न्यायालय के आदेश के अधीन, क्लिक कर इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट का आदेश देखें ।
Court No. - 17
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 872 of 2017
Petitioner :- Ranjeet Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranesh Dutt Tripathi,Seemant Singh
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
One of the issues raised in the instant writ petition is whether the impugned advertisement which seeks to make selection on the post of Assistant Teachers in the Basic Schools, run by the Basic Education Parishad, U.P., Allahabad, is valid or not in view of the law laid by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Shiv Kumar Sharma and others vs. State of U.P. and others 2013 (6) ADJ 310 and the Division Bench judgement in the case of Shiv Kumar Pathak and others vs. State of U.P. and others� 2013 (10) ADJ 21. It is noticeable that in these decisions, this Court has struck down the 15th and 16th Amendments respectively made to the Rules, whereby the selection is to be made on the basis of quality point mark to be calculated as per Appendix 1, having regard to the marks obtained by the candidate in High School, Intermediate, Graduation and Training qualification without giving any weightage to the marks obtained by a candidate in the T.E.T. Examination.� Although by 19th Amendment, Rule 14 has again been amended, but once again the same Appendix 1 which was introduced by 15th Amendment Act has been made the basis for calculating the quality point marks and for making the selection.
In the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the same could not be done in view of the authoritative pronouncement by the Full Bench striking down the 15th Amendment, as a result whereof Appendix 1 also does not survive.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1 and Sri P.D. Tripathi appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 and 3 pray for and are granted a week's time to obtain instructions in the matter or to file counter affidavit, if any.
Sri Seemant Singh, learned counsel who has filed impleadment application, has been heard as an intervener. He is also granted time to file counter affidavit, if any within the same period.
List on 23 January 2017.
In the meantime, if any selection is made on the advertised post, the same shall be subject to the decision of the writ petition.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 12.1.2017
skv
ख़बरें अब तक - 72825 प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों की भर्ती - Today's Headlines
- 72825 भर्ती में याची राहत , भविष्य और बुनियाद: जरूर पढ़ें
- UPTET 2011 के पास टेट पास याची कपिल देव की पोस्ट व नसीहत जरूर पढ़े
- 1100 याचियों की मौलिक नियुक्ति के आदेश के बाद अवशेष याचियों की नियुक्ति माननीय सुप्रीम कोर्ट के आदेश के अनुपालन से ही सम्भव: टीईटी सुप्रीम कोर्ट याचिकाकर्ता समूह-रवि शुक्ला
- Must Read & Share टी॰ई॰टी॰ बनाम एकेडेमिक / 12 वां संशोधन बनाम 15 वां संशोधन मुद्दा : सामान्य परिचय एवं प्रभाव
Court No. - 17
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 872 of 2017
Petitioner :- Ranjeet Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranesh Dutt Tripathi,Seemant Singh
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
One of the issues raised in the instant writ petition is whether the impugned advertisement which seeks to make selection on the post of Assistant Teachers in the Basic Schools, run by the Basic Education Parishad, U.P., Allahabad, is valid or not in view of the law laid by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Shiv Kumar Sharma and others vs. State of U.P. and others 2013 (6) ADJ 310 and the Division Bench judgement in the case of Shiv Kumar Pathak and others vs. State of U.P. and others� 2013 (10) ADJ 21. It is noticeable that in these decisions, this Court has struck down the 15th and 16th Amendments respectively made to the Rules, whereby the selection is to be made on the basis of quality point mark to be calculated as per Appendix 1, having regard to the marks obtained by the candidate in High School, Intermediate, Graduation and Training qualification without giving any weightage to the marks obtained by a candidate in the T.E.T. Examination.� Although by 19th Amendment, Rule 14 has again been amended, but once again the same Appendix 1 which was introduced by 15th Amendment Act has been made the basis for calculating the quality point marks and for making the selection.
In the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the same could not be done in view of the authoritative pronouncement by the Full Bench striking down the 15th Amendment, as a result whereof Appendix 1 also does not survive.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1 and Sri P.D. Tripathi appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 and 3 pray for and are granted a week's time to obtain instructions in the matter or to file counter affidavit, if any.
Sri Seemant Singh, learned counsel who has filed impleadment application, has been heard as an intervener. He is also granted time to file counter affidavit, if any within the same period.
List on 23 January 2017.
In the meantime, if any selection is made on the advertised post, the same shall be subject to the decision of the writ petition.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 12.1.2017
skv
- नीति आयोग इनकम टैक्स छूट सीमा बढ़ाने के पक्ष में नही, करदाता बढ़ाने के लिए 10 फीसदी स्लैब को 7 लाख करने का सुझाव
- बीएड-टेट उत्तीर्ण संघर्ष मोर्चा मयंक तिवारी के अनुसार दो दिन या इस सप्ताह में जारी हो सकता है शासनादेश
- 72825 प्रशिक्षु शिक्षक भर्ती, 29334 विज्ञान-गणित शिक्षक भर्ती व याची भर्तियाँ अब चुनावी आचार संहिता के चलते फंसी
- अब हम सफलता के काफ़ी नजदीक , पूरा डाटा/लेटर लखनऊ भेज दिया गया है : मयंक तिवारी
- लखनऊ ईटीवी की खबर असर, डीएम ने की ठंड की छुट्टी 16 जनवरी तक
ख़बरें अब तक - 72825 प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों की भर्ती - Today's Headlines