HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 22993 of 2015
Petitioner :- Ajeet Yadav And 4 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Tiwari,Navin Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav,R.A. Akhtar
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Mr. R.A. Akhtar, learned counsel appears for respondent no. 3, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1, and 4 and Sri A.K. Yadav learned counsel for respondent No. 2.
A Government Order dated 29.4.2014 was issued by the State Government to treat the reserved category candidates who have secured 82 marks, as pass in the TET Examination 2011.
Learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 4 could not dispute the said submission.
In view thereof, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that though petitioners have not been able to participate in the counselling held on 6th and 7th February, 2014, however in the event of future counselling, the petitioners' claims should be considered by the respondents if the petitioners produce provisional mark-sheet of T.E.T. 2011 and they apprehend that they will not be allowed to participate in the counselling. In case, the petitioners submit provisional T.E.T. certificate before respondent no. 2, their candidature may be considered for future round of counselling and also accept the application of the petitioners at the time of counselling, if any, held for the post of Assistant Teacher (Science and Mathemetics) in upper primary school run by U.P. Basic Education Board against 29,000 vacancies advertised on 11.07.2013.
With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 24.4.2015
S.Prakash
Petitioner :- Ajeet Yadav And 4 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Tiwari,Navin Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav,R.A. Akhtar
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Mr. R.A. Akhtar, learned counsel appears for respondent no. 3, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1, and 4 and Sri A.K. Yadav learned counsel for respondent No. 2.
A Government Order dated 29.4.2014 was issued by the State Government to treat the reserved category candidates who have secured 82 marks, as pass in the TET Examination 2011.
Learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 4 could not dispute the said submission.
In view thereof, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that though petitioners have not been able to participate in the counselling held on 6th and 7th February, 2014, however in the event of future counselling, the petitioners' claims should be considered by the respondents if the petitioners produce provisional mark-sheet of T.E.T. 2011 and they apprehend that they will not be allowed to participate in the counselling. In case, the petitioners submit provisional T.E.T. certificate before respondent no. 2, their candidature may be considered for future round of counselling and also accept the application of the petitioners at the time of counselling, if any, held for the post of Assistant Teacher (Science and Mathemetics) in upper primary school run by U.P. Basic Education Board against 29,000 vacancies advertised on 11.07.2013.
With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 24.4.2015
S.Prakash
सरकारी नौकरी - Government of India Jobs Originally published for http://e-sarkarinaukriblog.blogspot.com/ Submit & verify Email for Latest Free Jobs Alerts Subscribe