आर्डर न0 -2 यूपीटेट 2011-एक और सफेदा मैटर कोर्ट आर्डर(सरिता शुक्ला)
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48620 of 2015 Petitioner :- Sarita Shukla And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi,Anil Singh Bishen Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard Sri Radha Kant Ojha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi for the petitioners and Sri Mata Prasad, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
Petitioners are seeking quashing of the result dated 25.11.2011,30.11.2011 and 29.1.2015. Further prayer is for a direction to the respondents to decrease the marks of those candidates whose marks have been increased by six marks.
It has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that an enquiry in the matter regarding irregularities in the selection in question was ordered and an enquiry report has been submitted by the Chief Secretary dated 10.4.2012 in which wide scale irregularities have been reported.
With regard to marks it is submitted that in the report submitted by the Enquiry Committee headed by the Principal Secretary dated 10.4.2012 five questions in the Madhya Prathmik Star Pariksha, eight questions in the the Ucch Prathmik Star (Science) seven questions Ucch Prathmik Star (Arts) have been changed. It is also submitted that in the A series of the Prathmik as well as Ucch Prathmik Star question paper 11 questions have been changed. In para-11 of the report it is mentioned that six questions in the Prathmik Star Pariksha, eight questions in the Uchh Prathmik Star Pariksha, two questions in the Prathmik Star Pariksha (Urdu) are also wrong.
In para 22-c of the writ petition it is alleged that in the result of the T.E.T. 2011 issued on 29.1.2015 there are candidates, whose names are mentioned in the list, who were not allotted any roll number. Their name has been shown who were about 1096 in number. In para 22-e a list of other candidates has been mentioned who have been shown Absent in the result declared on 25.11.2011 but their names have been shown as qualified in the TET Examination-2011. This list consists of about 68 names.
This writ petition is therefore disposed of at the admission stage itself with the consent of learned counsel for the parties with a direction to the respondent no.1, Principal Secretary (Basic Education), Shiksha, U.P. Lucknow to scrutinize and examine all the OMR/Answer Sheets and also identify those cases where it has come on record that the result of even those candidates have been declared who have never appeared in the examinations.
सरकारी नौकरी - Army /Bank /CPSU /Defence /Faculty /Non-teaching /Police /PSC /Special recruitment drive /SSC /Stenographer /Teaching Jobs /Trainee / UPSC
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48620 of 2015 Petitioner :- Sarita Shukla And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi,Anil Singh Bishen Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard Sri Radha Kant Ojha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi for the petitioners and Sri Mata Prasad, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
Petitioners are seeking quashing of the result dated 25.11.2011,30.11.2011 and 29.1.2015. Further prayer is for a direction to the respondents to decrease the marks of those candidates whose marks have been increased by six marks.
It has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that an enquiry in the matter regarding irregularities in the selection in question was ordered and an enquiry report has been submitted by the Chief Secretary dated 10.4.2012 in which wide scale irregularities have been reported.
With regard to marks it is submitted that in the report submitted by the Enquiry Committee headed by the Principal Secretary dated 10.4.2012 five questions in the Madhya Prathmik Star Pariksha, eight questions in the the Ucch Prathmik Star (Science) seven questions Ucch Prathmik Star (Arts) have been changed. It is also submitted that in the A series of the Prathmik as well as Ucch Prathmik Star question paper 11 questions have been changed. In para-11 of the report it is mentioned that six questions in the Prathmik Star Pariksha, eight questions in the Uchh Prathmik Star Pariksha, two questions in the Prathmik Star Pariksha (Urdu) are also wrong.
In para 22-c of the writ petition it is alleged that in the result of the T.E.T. 2011 issued on 29.1.2015 there are candidates, whose names are mentioned in the list, who were not allotted any roll number. Their name has been shown who were about 1096 in number. In para 22-e a list of other candidates has been mentioned who have been shown Absent in the result declared on 25.11.2011 but their names have been shown as qualified in the TET Examination-2011. This list consists of about 68 names.
This writ petition is therefore disposed of at the admission stage itself with the consent of learned counsel for the parties with a direction to the respondent no.1, Principal Secretary (Basic Education), Shiksha, U.P. Lucknow to scrutinize and examine all the OMR/Answer Sheets and also identify those cases where it has come on record that the result of even those candidates have been declared who have never appeared in the examinations.
सरकारी नौकरी - Army /Bank /CPSU /Defence /Faculty /Non-teaching /Police /PSC /Special recruitment drive /SSC /Stenographer /Teaching Jobs /Trainee / UPSC