जैसा की मै्ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट ऑर्डर का अध्ययन किया, इसमें टेट पास शिक्षामित्रों का कहीं भी जिक्र नहीं आया है, स्पष्ट है कि टेट पास शिक्षामित्रों का पक्ष किसी भी कोर्ट में प्रभावी ढंग से नहीं रखा गया, वरना यह असंभव है
जो लोग सुप्रीम कोर्ट में रिव्यू मॉडिफिकेशन फाइल कर रहे हैं कृपया इन तथ्यों को खासकर अपने वकील के साथ डिस्कस कर लें| टेट पास शिक्षामित्रों से संबंधित कुछ पॉइंट नीचे क्लियर कर रहा हूं जहां पर हमें राहत मिल सकती है:-
My findings in supreme court order :-
--->🔴3.8(D) No absorption order has been issued for 46,000 intermediate shiksha mitras.
--->🔴 4(vi) TET paas sm were qualified
--->🔴 19. Relaxation under article 142 may be exercised in our favour.Since We don't violate fundamental right of children to get quality education.
--->🔴 23. A group of person among shiksha mitras, is dully qualified as per norms of section-23(1) of the RTE Act ,fulfilling all the eligibility criteria for an appointment.
--->🔴 24.This is our pray to consider the arguments of procedure under Order I rule 8 CPC.
Since many of us didn't got chance to represent us.
We posses all the necessary requisite qualifications to be appointed as teacher prior to our appointments,which is now under this concerned court matter.
Its mistake of policy maker's /govt not our's that they didn't appointed as as per rule/regulation.
So punishment should be given to those responsible authorities not to us.
We were dully fulfilling all necessary qualifications as per 23(1) of RTE Act,prior to our appointment.
Even many of us later applied in other fresh recruitments for the same post also & many of us got selected but we didn't taken part in counselling, for the issue of apointment letter.Just because we were working already at the same post of Assistant Teacher with the equal grade pay.If we join in another fresh appointment obviously we lose our seniority & increment in salery. So we didn't participated in counselling in other fresh recruitments held after our appointment as teacher. And many of us didn't even applied due to same reason,in the fear of loosing our seniority benefits.
We are the innocent teacher's, are nowhere mistaken. All the mistake done by our appointee as well as policy maker's.
No justice has been done in our favour in civil appeal no.9529 of 2017, order by the honourable supreme court.
- *प्रदीप सिंह यादव*
(बरेली)
ख़बरें अब तक - 72825 प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों की भर्ती - Today's Headlines
- टीचर पर इस कदर लट्टू हुई छात्रा कि प्यार को कबूल करवाने के लिए उतारे कपड़े
- शिक्षामित्रों के पास है एक और आसान तरीका, बिना TET समायोजन का
- UPTET के न्यू ऐड के लीडर वृजेन्द्र कश्यप की फेसबुक पोस्ट
- शिक्षामित्र मामले में अब तक कोई फैसला नहीं , कोर्ट आर्डर के पालन की कोशिश में सरकार
- UPTET एकेडमिक लीडर कपिल देव यादव की फेसबुक पोस्ट
- शिक्षामित्रों को जल्द ही मिल सकती है खुसखबरी
जो लोग सुप्रीम कोर्ट में रिव्यू मॉडिफिकेशन फाइल कर रहे हैं कृपया इन तथ्यों को खासकर अपने वकील के साथ डिस्कस कर लें| टेट पास शिक्षामित्रों से संबंधित कुछ पॉइंट नीचे क्लियर कर रहा हूं जहां पर हमें राहत मिल सकती है:-
My findings in supreme court order :-
--->🔴3.8(D) No absorption order has been issued for 46,000 intermediate shiksha mitras.
--->🔴 4(vi) TET paas sm were qualified
--->🔴 19. Relaxation under article 142 may be exercised in our favour.Since We don't violate fundamental right of children to get quality education.
--->🔴 23. A group of person among shiksha mitras, is dully qualified as per norms of section-23(1) of the RTE Act ,fulfilling all the eligibility criteria for an appointment.
--->🔴 24.This is our pray to consider the arguments of procedure under Order I rule 8 CPC.
Since many of us didn't got chance to represent us.
We posses all the necessary requisite qualifications to be appointed as teacher prior to our appointments,which is now under this concerned court matter.
Its mistake of policy maker's /govt not our's that they didn't appointed as as per rule/regulation.
So punishment should be given to those responsible authorities not to us.
We were dully fulfilling all necessary qualifications as per 23(1) of RTE Act,prior to our appointment.
Even many of us later applied in other fresh recruitments for the same post also & many of us got selected but we didn't taken part in counselling, for the issue of apointment letter.Just because we were working already at the same post of Assistant Teacher with the equal grade pay.If we join in another fresh appointment obviously we lose our seniority & increment in salery. So we didn't participated in counselling in other fresh recruitments held after our appointment as teacher. And many of us didn't even applied due to same reason,in the fear of loosing our seniority benefits.
We are the innocent teacher's, are nowhere mistaken. All the mistake done by our appointee as well as policy maker's.
No justice has been done in our favour in civil appeal no.9529 of 2017, order by the honourable supreme court.
- *प्रदीप सिंह यादव*
(बरेली)
- 2012 के विज्ञापन पे पुनः भर्ती सुरु करने के लिए टेट पास साथियो से अपील
- UPTET Shiksha Mitra News - SM की सीट पर प्राइमरी 72825 नए विज्ञापन वालों ने अपना दावा SC में पेश किया
- यूपी कैबिनेट में 30 हजार भर्तियों पर फैसला, लिखित परीक्षा होगी चयन का आधार
- सुप्रीमक़ोर्ट के फैसले के बाद यूपी सरकार के सामने आई बड़ी समस्या: शिक्षामित्र ग्रुप से
- शिक्षामित्रों की मांग पर ये रहा योगी सरकार का जबाव, पढ़ें ये खबर
- शिक्षामित्रों को कोई रियायत नहीं, नवंबर में देना होगा एग्जाम
- Breaking : मुजफ्फरनगर में शिक्षामित्रों पर लाठीचार्ज....डीएम कार्यालय पर मांगों को लेकर धरना देते समय हुआ हंगामा
ख़बरें अब तक - 72825 प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों की भर्ती - Today's Headlines