शिक्षामित्रों के दूरस्थ विधि से प्रशिक्षण के सम्बन्ध में दाखिल रिट ख़ारिज
देखें क्या है हाई कोर्ट का आदेश :
सरकारी नौकरी - Army /Bank /CPSU /Defence /Faculty /Non-teaching /Police /PSC /Special recruitment drive /SSC /Stenographer /Teaching Jobs /Trainee / UPSC
देखें क्या है हाई कोर्ट का आदेश :
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Chief Justice's Court
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 28004 of 2011
Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Mishra And Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,K.S.Kushwaha,Mohd. Ali Ausaf,R.A.Akhtar
Hon'ble Dr. Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud,Chief Justice
Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
The petitioners had been engaged as Shiksha Mitras pursuant to a Government Order dated 26 May 1999 on payment of honorarium for a period of eleven months subject to renewal on satisfactory performance. The Government Order dated 1 July 2001 clarified that the scheme was not a scheme for employment in regular service since its object was to provide to educated rural youth an opportunity to render community service at the level of primary education.
On 3 January 2011, a proposal was submitted by the State Government to the National Council for Teacher Education for training of Shiksha Mitras. The proposal was for conducting a two year diploma in elementary education for Shiksha Mitras through the open and distance learning mode. The department prepared a list of Shiksha Mitras who would be imparted two years training.
The writ petition has been filed by Shiksha Mitras for quashing the order dated 14 January 2011 passed by the National Council for Teacher Education approving the proposal of the State Government for conducting the diploma through the open and distance learning mode and to direct the respondents to only permit the candidates possessing B.Ed. degrees for appointment in the Institutions run by the Board.
This petition has been listed with a batch of writ petitions relating to Shiksha Mitras but submissions have not been advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners. Even otherwise, we find that the two years training has already been imparted to the Shiksha Mitras whose names were included in the list and that the petitioners have not sought the quashing of the list.�
This petition, therefore, deserves to be dismissed and is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 12.9.2015
GS
(Dr D Y Chandrachud,CJ)
(Dilip Gupta, J)
(Yashwant Varma, J)
