If TET Pass Candidates are not available in sufficient number then minimum qualification (TET) can be relaxe. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (CAT) , NCTE, Supreme Court of India, RTE,
हालाँकि केट एक अर्ध न्यायिक अदालत होती है और केंद्र सरकार के कर्मचारियों के प्रशासनिक मामलों को त्वरित रूप से निपटाने के लिए बनाई गई है ।
इसके जज क़्वासी जुडिशियल बॉडी यानि अर्ध सरकारी जज कहलाते हैं और इसीलिये फैसला देने वाले अपने आप को जज की जगह मेंबर लिखते हैं
इनके फैसलों को ऊपरी अदालत अर्थात हाई कोर्ट में चुनौती दी जा सकती है , आज से कुछ साल पहले जब यह केस सामने आया था तो बड़े बड़े न्यूज़ पेपर ने
खबर बेचने के लिये लिखा था की - केंद्रीय न्यायिक प्राधिकरण ने टेट से छूट दे दी
जबकि ये ट्राइब्यूनल / प्राधिकरण वास्तव में पूरी कोर्ट भी नहीं कहलाते , और कई बार हाई कोर्ट ने ही केट (केंद्रीय न्यायिक प्राधिकरण) को इसके कुछ निर्णय पर फटकार लगाई है ,हाई कोर्ट तो केंद्रीय सूचना आयोग को भी कई फटकार लगा चुका है और इस आयोग को दण्डित भी कर चुका है ।
केंद्रीय सूचना आयोग भी अर्ध न्यायिक ट्राइब्यूनल है और हाई कोर्ट से नीचे आती है
वास्तव में केंद्रीय न्यायिक प्राधिकरण का ऑर्डर था ->अगर टेट पास अभ्यर्थी पर्याप्त संख्या में उपलब्ध नहीं , तो टेट में छूट संभव
ऑर्डर देखिए ->>
fresh qualification made essential for the post i.e. CTET, only about 146 candidates were found to be eligible to work as Resource Teacher on contract basis.
Court Ordered ->>>
direction to the respondents to assess the requirement of Resource Teachers in the project in question and if it is found that sufficient eligible teachers are not available to discharge the function as Resource Teacher in the project on contract basis, they would take up the matter to relax the condition of minimum qualification in terms of Section 23 (2)
ताज़ा खबरें - प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों की भर्ती सरकारी नौकरी - Army /Bank /CPSU /Defence /Faculty /Non-teaching /Police /PSC /Special recruitment drive /SSC /Stenographer /Teaching Jobs /Trainee / UPSC
हालाँकि केट एक अर्ध न्यायिक अदालत होती है और केंद्र सरकार के कर्मचारियों के प्रशासनिक मामलों को त्वरित रूप से निपटाने के लिए बनाई गई है ।
इसके जज क़्वासी जुडिशियल बॉडी यानि अर्ध सरकारी जज कहलाते हैं और इसीलिये फैसला देने वाले अपने आप को जज की जगह मेंबर लिखते हैं
इनके फैसलों को ऊपरी अदालत अर्थात हाई कोर्ट में चुनौती दी जा सकती है , आज से कुछ साल पहले जब यह केस सामने आया था तो बड़े बड़े न्यूज़ पेपर ने
खबर बेचने के लिये लिखा था की - केंद्रीय न्यायिक प्राधिकरण ने टेट से छूट दे दी
जबकि ये ट्राइब्यूनल / प्राधिकरण वास्तव में पूरी कोर्ट भी नहीं कहलाते , और कई बार हाई कोर्ट ने ही केट (केंद्रीय न्यायिक प्राधिकरण) को इसके कुछ निर्णय पर फटकार लगाई है ,हाई कोर्ट तो केंद्रीय सूचना आयोग को भी कई फटकार लगा चुका है और इस आयोग को दण्डित भी कर चुका है ।
केंद्रीय सूचना आयोग भी अर्ध न्यायिक ट्राइब्यूनल है और हाई कोर्ट से नीचे आती है
वास्तव में केंद्रीय न्यायिक प्राधिकरण का ऑर्डर था ->अगर टेट पास अभ्यर्थी पर्याप्त संख्या में उपलब्ध नहीं , तो टेट में छूट संभव
ऑर्डर देखिए ->>
fresh qualification made essential for the post i.e. CTET, only about 146 candidates were found to be eligible to work as Resource Teacher on contract basis.
Court Ordered ->>>
direction to the respondents to assess the requirement of Resource Teachers in the project in question and if it is found that sufficient eligible teachers are not available to discharge the function as Resource Teacher in the project on contract basis, they would take up the matter to relax the condition of minimum qualification in terms of Section 23 (2)
CENTRAL ADMINSITRATIVE TRIBUNAL (CAT) Judgement/ Order of Court ->>>
PRINCIPAL BENCH
NEW DELHI
OA 3104/2013
MA 2532/2013
MA 2369/2013
this the 9th day of July, 2014
Hon ble Mr. A.K.Bhardwaj, Member (J)
Hon ble Dr..Birendra Kumar Sinha, Member (A)
1. Shri Ratnesh Kumar Singh,
S/o Shri Surender Nath Singh, Aged 33 years,
R/o Block A, 421,
Minto Road Complex,
New Delhi 110 002
(File No.36
MR)
2 Shri Desh Raj Patel
S/o Shri Ram Raj Patel, aged 33 years,
R/o A 421,
Minto Road Complex
New Delhi 110 002
(File
No. 21 HI)
3. Shri Shravan Kumar Yadav
S/o Shri Vindhyachal Yadav, aged 31 years,
R/o D-Block 816,
Jahangirpuri,
Delhi-33
(File No.19 HI)
4 Shri Atif Ali
S/o Shri Majid Ali, aged 31 years,
R/o Block-R, 68 G.Dilshad Garden,
Delhi -95
(File No.259 MR)
5. Shri Ram Gopal
S/o Shri Radhey Shyam, aged 35 years,
R/o K 35/5,
Near DESU Transformer Rubber Factory Road,
West Ghonda, Delhi-93
(File No.46 MR)
6. Shri Nityanend
S/o Shri Gore Lal Singh, aged 32 years
R/o H.No.1791,
South Extension,
Part I Kotla Mubarkpur,
Prasadi
Gali, Delhi 110 003
(File No.99 BI)
7. Ms. Sulakshana Yadav
D/o Shri Veer Singh, aged 31 years
R/o RZ 148/74, Gali
No.10, Sagar Pur East,
New Delhi 110 046
(File No.43 MH)
8. Shri Jayram Singh Yadav
S/o Shri Prahaled Singh
Yadav, aged 35 years R/o Village Chaubatue, Post
Zahurabed Distt. Ghazipur (UP)
(File No.285 MR)
9. Shri Pradeep Kumar Singh
S/o Shri Ram Dhani
Singh, Aged 35 years R/o Village Fahtepur Post
Baragoar Distt. Varanasi (UP)
(File No.182 HI)
10. Shri Surendra Kumar
S/o Shri Ram
Lakhan, Aged 33 years R/o VPO Barahi
Newada, Varanasi (UP) (File No.190 HI)
11. Shri Kalendra Bharti
S/o Shri Ram, aged
34 years R/o D Block 817,
Jahangirpuri, Delhi- 110 033
(File No. 24 HI)
12. Shri Surender Yadav
S/o Shri Dinesh
Chander Yadav, aged 31 years R/o VPO Nawanagar Distt. Ballia
(UP)-221717 (File No.60 HI)
13. Shri Sandeep Kumar
S/o Shri Hari Lal,
aged 34 years R/o Plot 53,
Shivpuri Colony, Hazari
Chhawni Bhiti
Varanasi (UP) 221008
(File No.117 VI)
14. Shri Vinod Kumar Verma
S/o Shri Hari Lal
Verma, aged 32 years R/o VPO, Harsos, Distt.
Varanasi (File No.106 VI)
15. Ms.Reetu
D/o
Raman Singh, aged 25 years R/o
3/116, Parbhu Nagar Opp. Suri Petrol Pump Old Rohtak Road,
Sonipat, Haryana 131 001
(File No.42 MR)
16. Ms. Indresh Varma
D/o Shri Om
Prakash Varma, aged 42 years R/o E-275, Eldeco Colony
Rai Bareily Road
Lucknow (UP)-226025 (File No.189 HI)
17. Shri Navin Gour
S/o Shri
Umesh Kumar, aged 33 years R/o H No.195,
F/10, Hanuman Mandir Gali, Near BDO Office,
K.D.Nagar Gannaur,
Sonepat,
Haryana 131101
(File No.186 HI)
18. Shri Mukesh Kumar Dhania
S/o Shri Man Singh,
aged 33 years R/o PO-Kohar,
Teh-Behror
Distt.-Alwar, Rajasthan- 301 709
(File No.110 VI)
19. Shri Dinesh Kumar Meena
S/o Ram Charan Meena,
aged 33 years R/o Post-Raghopura,
The-Bamanwas Distt Sawai Madnopur
Raj-322211
(File
No.128 VI)
20. Ms. Soni Singh
D/o Shri
Suranjay Singh, aged 29 years R/o Village
Hariharpur Chhwani Post -
Hariharpur,
Distt.-Jaunpur (UP)
(File No.169 HI)
21. Shri Rajender Prasad
Suredia S/o Shri Jagdeesh
Prasad Suredia, aged about 36 years R/o Village Jatganwara
PO Jakhrana, Reh-Behror
Distt.-Alwar,
Raj
301713
(File No.HI 284 MR)
22. Shri Munna Lal Chauhan
S/o Shri Cheedi
Chauhan, aged 31 years R/o VPO, Patoi, Distt.
Ballia (UP) 221716 (File No.HI 153)
23. Shri Tejpal Singh
S/o Shri
Mukat Singh, aged 32 years R/o Village
Nagla Dadra, Post Parsera Distt. Aligarh
(UP) 202137 (File No.39
MR)
24. Shri Dharmender Kumar
S/o Mauji Lal, aged
27 years R/o 34/1
Block-34, Trilokpuri, Delhi
110 092
(File No.248 MR)
25. Ms. Monika
D/o Shri
Prakash Chand, aged 27 years R/o 46, Savitri
Nagar, Malviya Nagar New Delhi 110 017
(File
No.219 MR)
26. Ms. Anju Tiwari
D/o Ashok
Kumar, aged 31 years R/o Flat
No.5, Top Florr, Bharamjeet Chowk Near Talab Chowk,
Mandwali Delhi 110 092
(File No.VI 58)
27.. Ms. Meeta Das
D/o Shri
Madhu Das, aged 25 years R/o A-25,
Kasturba Niketan Complex Lajpat Nagar-II,
New Delhi 110 024 (File No.305 MR)
28. Ms. Suman
D/o
K.L.Sharma, aged 26 years R/o
RZ A1, Pratap Garden
Near Bindapur Ext., New Delhi 110 059 (File
No.205 MR)
29. Ms. Shashi Katiyal
W/o Pawan
Katiyal, aged 35 years R/o H.No.291,
Sector-55, Faridabad (File No.258 MR)
30. Shri Amarjeet
S/o Shri
Chandramma, aged 31 years R/o Village
Sikrour, Post Office, Luduhi Distt.-Mau (UP)
(File No.121 VI)
31. Shri Sandhya Sah
D/o Shri
H.P.Sah, aged 38 years R/o
B1/D, 1st Floor, Jitar Nagar
Delhi 110 051
(File No.29 CP)
32. Ms. Neeta Kumari Basu
D/o Basudev, aged 42
years R/o H.No.1310,
Gali No.13 Govind
Puri, Kalkaji, New Delhi (File
No.46 MR)
33. Ms. Manisha Pandey
D/o Shri Ashish
Kumar, 34 years R/o A-32,
Ground Floor, Guru Ram Das Nagar Laxmi Nagar, Delhi
110 092 (File No.293 MR)
34. Ms. Rekha
D/o
Bhori Lal, aged 34 years
R/o F 305, Budh Nagar
Inderpuri, New Delhi 110 012
(File No.48-MR)
35. Ms. Asha Kumari
W/o Shri
Virendera Kumar, aged 32 years R/o 196, Masid,
South Extension Part-II New Delhi 110 049
(File No.297
MR)
36. Shri Girish Kumar
S/o Shri Ram
Gopal, aged 37 years R/o Plot
No.E-63, Ram Nagar Extension, Sodala Jaipur,
Rajasthan 302019 (File No.296 MR)
37. Shri Balram Meena
S/o Bheru Lal
Meena, aged 33 years R/o VPO
Bicchidiona
Tehsil Malarnadunger
Distt. Swami Madhopur,
Rajasthan 322 033
(File No.304 MR)
38. Ms Madhu Bala Kumari
D/o Shri Tun Tun
Prasad, aged 27 years R/o EP 7 139, Sarojini
Nagar, Delhi 23 (File No.32 MR)
39. Shri Deep Chandra Tiwari
S/o Shri Vimal
Tiwari, aged 32 years R/o House no.60,
Extension-3, Nangloi Delhi -110 041
(File
No.174 HI)
40 Shri Saurabh Tiwari
S/o Vimal
Chandra Tiwari, aged 29 years R/o House
No.60, Extension-3, Nangloi Delhi 110 041
(File No.97 VI)
41. Ms.Anju Kumari
D/o Shri
Sambhu Lal, aged 26 years R/o
H.No.11A 2nd floor, Amritpuri, East
of Kailash, New Delhi 110 065 (File
No.253 MR)
42. Ms.Anamika Verma
D/o Shri Kamlesh
Kumar Verma, aged 25 years R/o H.No.1089, Gali No.10,
Govind Puri Kalkaji, New Delhi 19
(File No.187 HI)
43. Shri Ashish Kumar Yadav
S/o Shri Kamala
Prasad Yadav, aged R/o Village Anand
Nagar Patulakhi PO Karchana,
Distt-Allahabad (UP) 212307 (File No.59 HI)
44. Shri Bisheshwar Kumar
S/o Shri Hira Ram,
aged 33 years R/o Village
Rasoolpur
Taluka Kasim Khan,
Post Ghosi,
Distt Mau (UP)
(File No.120 VI)
45. Shri Reena Shakya
W/o Shri
Abdesh Kumar, aged 30 years R/o 34/1, 2nd
floor, Trilok Puri Delhi -91
(File No.211 MR)
46. Shri Sandeep Kumar
Pandey S/o Shri Ganga
Saran Pandey, aged 31 years R/o 33/376, Trilok Puri,
Delhi 91 (File No.136 HI)
47. Ms. Sandhya
D/o Shri
Gobind Saran Mishra, aged 32 years R/o Flat No.10, C8,
Gali No.9, Hindan Vihar Barola, Noida-Sector 49,
Uttar Pradesh (File No. 270 MR)
48. Ms. Pushpa Rawat
D/o Shri
B.S.Rawat, aged 34 years R/o 524
B-2, Ext.II, B-Block
Shalimar Garden, Sahibabad, Ghazibad, UP (File
No.266 MR)
49. Ms. Seema
D/o Shri
Balwant Singh Dafauli, aged 32 years R/o A-19, Gali
No.13, Ambedkar Place Baprola Vihar, New
Delhi 43 (File No.246
MR)
50. Ms. Krishna Baluni
W/o Shri
Naresh Baluni, aged 36 years R/o House
No.149, Sector 12, Noida, UP (File No.MR)]
51. Shri Navneet Kumar
Dwivedi S/o Shri Ashok
Kumar Dwivedi, aged 35 years R/o 162, Sagar Kunj,
Rajeev Gandhi Nagar
PO &
Distt. Farukkhabad
UP -209625
(File No.254 MR)
52 Shri Shradha Mishra
D/o Shri Nawal
Kishore Mishra, aged 34 years R/o -4/20, Kiran Bazar, PO
& Distt. Farukhabad UP 209625
(File No.62 VI)
53. Shri Subhash Chand Nagar
S/o Shri Om Parkash,
aged 33 years R/o 1/45, Rakshapuram
Mawana Road,
Meerut, UP -2500104 (File No.290 MR)
54. Shri Sandeep Kumar
S/o Shri
Shaker, aged 25 years R/o
Village-Ganjeri
PO-Sohganli,
Distt. Sultanpur
UP-228155
(File No.175 HI)
55. Shri Panna Lal
S/o Shri
Banvasi Lal, aged 30 years R/o
Village Kodhaniya, Post Bharari Meja
Road, Allahabad
UP 212302
(File No.23 HI)
56. Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma
S/o Shri Rama Kant
Sharma, aged 29 years R/o Village Tundihar, Post
Bharari Meja Road, Distt.-Allahabad
(UP) (File No.07 VI)
57. Shri Rajesh Kumar
S/o Shri Bhart
Ram, aged 32 years R/o D Block,
Natiz Road, Batla House Okhla, Delhi 110
025 (File No.18
HI)
58. Ms.Sarika Sawaria
W/o Shri
Naresh Kumar, aged 34 years R/o C 74, LIG
Flats, Ashok Vihar, Phase-IV Delhi 52
(File No.226 MR)
59. Ms. Anuradha
W/o Gaje
Singh, aged 40 years R/o
H.No.10, VPO Mukhmel Pur, Delhi
110 036
(File No.225 MR)
60. Ms. Sushma Singh Rawat
W/o Shri Sanjiv
Singh Rawat, aged 37 years R/o H.No.710, Sector II,
Vasundhra Ghaziabad, UP
(File No.238
MR)
61. Ms. Kusum Pant
W/o Shri Manoj
Pant, aged 33 years R/o C-36 A Hardev
Nagar, Jharoda,
Burari
Delhi -85
(File No.240 MR)
62. Ms. Neelam Agarwal
W/o Late Narender
Kumar, aged 36 years R/o H.No.63, Laxmi Vihar,
Burari, Delhi-84 (File No.HI 141)
63. Ms. Ashok Kumar
S/o Shri Fattan
Singh, aged 38 years R/o D-100,
Avantika Sector-1, Rohini New Delhi 84
(File No.HI-17)
64. Ms. Sushma Tiwari
W/o Shri
K.K.Tiwari, aged 39 years R/o D-100,
Avantika Sector-1, Rohini New Delhi -84
(File No. HI-17)
65. Ms. Aradhana Singh
W/o Ms. Ritu Raj
Singh, aged 29 years R/o M-96, Ram Krishna
Apartments Plot No.29, I.P.Extension
Patparganj, Delhi
110 092 (File No.HI-13)
66. Ms. Rakhi Gupta
W/o Dr.
Rakesh Kumar, aged 40 years R/o J-4/19A,
Khirkhi Extension Malviya
Nagar, New Delhi 110 017 (File No.MR
53)
67. Mr. Usha
W/o
Shri Rajesh Kumar, aged 35 years R/o
J-3/92, DDA Flats Kalkaji,
New Delhi 110 019
(File No.MR 53)
68. Ms. Asha Rani
W/o Shri
Hem Chand, aged 39 years R/o H.No.153,
Johripur Main Road, Delhi 94
(MR
220)
69. Ms. Manju Bala
W/o Late
Gopal Dass Ahuja, aged 42 years R/o 7/385 A,
Jawala Nagar, Main Road Shahadara Opposite MCD School,
Delhi 110 032
(File No.236
MR)
70. Ms. Parul
D/o
Shri Rana Pratap Singh, aged 42 years R/o C-86,
Jhilmil Colony, Delhi 110 095 (File No.243 MR)
71. Ms. Shalini Jain
W/o Shri
Saurabh Kumar Jain, aged 33 years R/o 11/344, DDA
Flats, East of Kailash, New Delhi 110 065
(File
No.HI-165)
72. Ms. Bhawna Sharma
W/o Sudhakar
Sharma, aged 33 years R/o D22/8, Street
No.2, Madhuban Maujpur
Delhi-53
(File No.16-HI)
73. Ms. Savita
W/o Shri
Rajeev Kumar R/o
H.No.611. Dr. Ambedkar Basti Ghonda,
Delhi 110 053
74. Ms. Pratiksha Pandey
D/o Shri U.N.Pandey
R/o Kartikay
Apartment MS 1-61 Vrindavan
Garden, Sahibabad Ghaziabad,
UP.
75. Ms. Swapna Pandey
D/o Shri U.N.Pandey
R/o O
Kartikay Apartment MS 1-61 Vrindavan
Garden, Sahibabad
Ghaziabad, UP
76. Ms. Tripti Singh
D/o Shri
Raguender Prasad Singh W/o 514,
Patrakar Parishad, Sector-5 Vasundhara
Ghaziabad, UP 201012
77. Ms. Sneha
D/o
Shri Neetan Vig,
R/o IInd Floor
Subash Nagar, Delhi-27
78. Ms. Amarjeet Kaur
W/o Shri
Jitender Singh
R/o RZ/B-128, Vishnu Garden
(Nursing Garden) Delhi -18
79. Ms. Anju Sain
W/o Shri Mukesh
Sain R/o A5A/250,
Janakpuri New Delhi
-58
80. Ms. Sudesh Devi
W/o Shri
Suresh Kumar R/o
K-13, Old Govind Park
Ext. Street No.6, Delhi -51
81. Shri Vijay Pratap Singh
S/o Shri Shobha
Nath Singh R/o Village
Birapatti, Distt.
Varanasi 221105 (UP)
82. Ms. Arushi Tyagi
W/o Shri
Vineet Tyagi
R/ H.No.119, Phase-III
Vikas Nagar, Hastsal, Uttam Nagar
New Delhi 59
Applicants (By Advocate: Shri Ashok Aggarwal)
Versus
1. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Through its Chief Secretary
Delhi Secretariat
I.P.Estate , New Delhi 110 002.
2. State Project Director-SSA Office of the UEE Missions Govt. of NCT of Delhi
I Floor, Near Estate Branch
Department of Education
Distt.-North, Lucknow Road
Delhi 110 054 . Respondents
(By Advocate: Shri Vijay Pandita)
ORDER (ORAL)
By Hon ble Mr.A.K.Bhardwaj,
MA No. 2532/2013
For the reasons stated therein, MA is allowed.
OA 3104/2013
The applicants were appointed as Resource Teachers in SSA (UEE Mission) on the following dates :-
S.No. Name File No. Date of appointment
1. Shri Ratnesh Kumar Singh, S/o Shri Surender Nath Singh 36 MR 13.07.2009
2 Shri Desh Raj Patel S/oShri Ram Raj Patel 21 HI 13.07.2009
3. Shri Shravan Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Vindhyachal Yadav 19 HI 13.07.2009
4 Shri Atif Ali S/o Shri Majid Ali 259 MR 19.02.2011
5. Shri Ram Gopal S/o Shri Radhey Shyam 46 MR 15.02.2011
6. Shri Nityanend S/o Shri Gore Lal Singh 99 BI 17.02.2011
7. Ms. Sulakshana Yadav D/o Shri Veer Singh 43 MH 13.07.2009
8. Shri Jayram Singh Yadav S/o Shri Prahaled Singh Yadav 285 MR 19.02.2011
9. Shri Pradeep Kumar Singh S/o Shri Ram Dhani Singh 182 HI 18.02.2011
10. Shri Surendra Kumar S/o Shri Ram Lakhan 190 HI 18.02.2011
11. Shri Kalendra Bharti S/o Shri Ram 24 HI 12.08.2009
12. Shri Surender Yadav S/o Shri Dinesh Chander Yadav 60 HI 27.07.2010
13. Shri Sandeep Kumar S/o Shri Hari Lal 117 VI 17.02.2011
14. Shri Vinod Kumar Verma S/o Shri Hari Lal Verma 106 VI 17.02.2011
15. Ms.Reetu D/o Raman Singh 42 MR 18.02.2011
16. Ms. Indresh Varma D/o Shri Om Prakash Varma 189 HI 18.02.2011
17. Shri Navin Gour S/o Shri Umesh Kumar 186 HI 18.02.2011
18. Shri Mukesh Kumar Dhania S/o Shri Man Singh 110 VI 25.02.2011
19. Shri Dinesh Kumar Meena S/o Ram Charan Meena 128 VI 25.02.2011
20. Ms. Soni Singh S/o Shri Suranjay Singh 169 HI 25.02.2011
21. Shri Rajender Prasad Suredia S/o Shri Jagdeesh Prasad Suredia 284 MR 25.02.2011
22. Shri Munna Lal Chauhan S/o Shri Cheedi Chauhan 153 HI 28.02.2011
23. Shri Tejpal Singh S/o Shri Mukat Singh 39 MR 13.07.2009
24. Shri Dharmender Kumar S/o Mauji Lal 248 MR 15.02.2011
25. Ms. Monika D/o Shri Prakash Chand 219 MR 19.02.2011
26. Ms. Anju Tiwari D/o Ashok Kumar 58 VI 17.02.2011
27.. Ms. Meeta Das D/o Shri Madhu Das 305 MR 19.02.2011
28. Ms. Suman D/o K.L.Sharma 205 MR 19.02.2011
29. Ms. Shashi Katiyal W/o Pawan Katiyal 258 MR 19.02.2011
30. Shri Amarjeet S/o Shri Chandramma 121 VI 17.02.2011
31. Shri Sandhya Sah D/o Shri H.P.Sah CP-29 18.02.2011
32. Ms. Neeta Kumari Basu D/o Basudev 46 MR 24.07.2009
33. Ms. Manisha Pandey D/o Shri Ashish Kumar 239 MR 19.02.2011
34. Ms. Rekha D/o Bhori Lal 48 MR 13.07.2009
35. Ms. Asha Kumari W/o Shri Virendera Kumar 297 MR 19.02.2011
36. Shri Girish Kumar S/o Shri Ram Gopal 296 MR 19.02.2011
37. Shri Balram Meena S/o Bheru Lal Meena 304 MR 18.02.2011
38. Ms Madhu Bala Kumari D/o Shri Tun Tun Prasad 32 MR 13.07.2009
39. Shri Deep Chandra Tiwari S/o Shri Vimal Tiwari 174 HI 25.02.2011
40 Shri Saurabh Tiwari S/o Vimal Chandra Tiwari 97 VI 25.02.2011
41. Ms.Anju Kumari D/o Shri Sambhu Lal 253 MR 03.03.2011
42. Ms.Anamika Verma D/o Shri Kamlesh Kumar Verma 187 HI 03.03.2011
43. Shri Ashish Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Kamala Prasad Yadav 59 HI 04.05.2010
44. Shri Bisheshwar Kumar S/o Shri Hira Ram 120 VI 28.02.2011
45. Shri Reena Shakya W/o Shri Abdesh Kumar 211 MR 19.02.2011
46. Shri Sandeep Kumar Pandey S/o Shri Ganga Saran Pandey 136 HI 18.02.2011
47. Ms. Sandhya D/o Shri Gobind Saran Mishra 270 MR 19.02.2011
48. Ms. Pushpa Rawat D/o Shri B.S.Rawat 266 MR 19.02.2011
49. Ms. Seema D/o Shri Balwant Singh 246 MR 19.02.2011
50. Ms. Krishna Baluni W/o Shri Naresh Baluni 261 MR 19.02.2011
51. Shri Navneet Kumar Dwivedi S/o Shri Ashok Kumar Dwivedi 254 MR 19.02.2011
52 Shri Shradha Mishra D/o Shri Nawal Kishore Mishra 62 VI 17.02.2011
53. Shri Subhash Chand Nagar S/o Shri Om Parkash 290 MR 19.02.2011
54. Shri Sandeep Kumar S/o Shri Shaker 175 HI 18.02.2011
55. Shri Panna Lal S/o Shri Banvasi Lal 23 HI 13.07.2009
56. Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Rama Kant Sharma 07 VI 17.02.2011
57. Shri Rajesh Kumar S/o Shri Bhart Ram 18 HI 13.07.2009
58. Ms.Sarika Sawaria W/o Shri Naresh Kumar 226 MR 19.02.2011
59. Ms. Anuradha W/o Gaje Singh 225 MR 19.02.2011
60. Ms. Sushma Singh Rawat W/o Shri Sanjiv Singh Rawat 238 MR 19.02.2011
61. Ms. Kusum Pant W/o Shri Manoj Pant 240 MR 19.02.2011
62. Ms. Neelam Agarwal W/o Late Narender Kumar 141 HI 19.02.2011
63. Ms. Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Fattan Singh 103 MR 19.02.2011
64. Ms. Sushma Tiwari W/o Shri K.K.Tiwari 17 HI 13.07.2011
65. Ms. Aradhana Singh W/o Ms. Ritu Raj Singh 13 HI 13.07.2009
66. Ms. Rakhi Gupta W/o Dr. Rakesh Kumar 44 MR 15.02.2011
67. Mr. Usha W/o Shri Rajesh Kumar 53 MR 15.02.2011
68. Ms. Asha Rani W/o Shri Hem Chand 22 MR 19.02.2011
69. Ms. Manju Bala W/o Late Gopal Dass Ahuja 236 MR 19.02.2011
70. Ms. Parul D/o Shri Rana Pratap Singh 243 MR 19.02.2011
71. Ms. Shalini Jain W/o Shri Saurabh Kumar Jain HI 165 18.02.2011
72. Ms. Bhawna Sharma W/o Sudhakar Sharma HI 16 24.06.2009
2. The grievance of the
applicant in the present OA is against introduction of CTET
qualification for engagement of Resource Teachers on contract basis.
Shri Ashok Aggarwal, learned counsel for applicant submitted that the
respondents need Resource Teachers who could impart special education to
disabled children in different schools of NCT of Delhi Government and
requirement of such teachers was approximately 2400, while with the fresh
qualification made essential for the post i.e. CTET, only about 146
candidates were found to be eligible to work as Resource Teacher on
contract basis.
3. On the other hand, Shri
Vijay Pandita, learned counsel for respondents submitted that the
applicants were appointed only in a project where there is no need of
more Resource Teachers. Relying upon the letter dated 11th February,
2011 of National Council for Teacher Education, he submitted that in
terms of the provisions of sub-section 1 of Section 23 of the RTE
Act, the National Council for Teacher Education had issued notification
dated 23.08.2010 laying the minimum qualification of the persons
eligible for appointment as teacher for class I to VIII and one of the
essential qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a
teacher in any of the schools referred to in clause (n) of section 2
of the RTE Act is that he/she should have passed the Teacher Eligibility
Test (TET). He also placed reliance on 199th PAB meeting dated
12.04.2013 to espouse his argument that the contractual appointment of
the applicant was only in a project. Finally he referred to Judgment
of the Hon ble Delhi High in W.P.(C) No.2544/2013 & CM
Nos.4818-19/2013, Ruchika Arora & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.
wherein the Hon ble Delhi High Court ruled that what qualification
should be required to be satisfied by a candidate need to be looked
into by the specialized body and should not be gone into by the
court. Admittedly, the said judgment was upheld by a DB of the Hon ble
High Court.
4. Rejoining the submissions, Shri Ashok Aggarwal, learned counsel
for the applicant referred to Section 23 (2) of Right to Education Act
and submitted that when the respondents are unable to find sufficient
number of trained teachers possessing minimum qualification as provided
in at the act Section 23 (1), the Central
Government, if necessary, by a notification could relax the
qualification required for appointment of teachers. He also submitted
that in terms of Section 25 & 26 of the Right of Children to Free
and Compulsory Education Act, it is imperative for the respondents to
ensure that the Pupil-Teacher Ratio as specified under schedule is
maintained.
5. We heard the counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. As has been ruled by
Delhi High Court in Ruchika Arora & Ors. Vs. Union of India &
Ors (ibid), it is not for us to take a view that what qualification is
required for a teacher to become eligible for a particular post.
7. Nevertheless, as has been
provided in the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education
Act, 2009, the Central Government may relax the minimum qualification
for the post to have sufficient teachers to abide by the Section 25
& 26 of the Act. Shri Ashok Agarwal, learned counsel for the
applicant specifically submitted that sufficient number of Resource
Teachers should be available with Government of NCT of Delhi for the
project in question.
8. In the circumstances, the OA is disposed of with direction
to the respondents to assess the requirement of Resource Teachers in
the project in question and if it is found that sufficient eligible
teachers are not available to discharge the function as Resource
Teacher in the project on contract basis, they would take up the
matter to relax the condition of minimum qualification in terms of
Section 23 (2). They will examine whether there is any
need to appoint Resource Teachers by relaxing the minimum
qualification in the case of the applicant. It is made clear that if
there is no teacher required in the stream of Resource Teacher, it would
not be mandatory to respondents to enhance the requirement to
accommodate the applicants. Nevertheless, while
doing the aforesaid exercise, they would
Keep in view Sections 25 & 26 of the Right of Children to Free and
Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
OA stands disposed of.
( Dr. B.K. Sinha ) ( A.K. Bhardwaj )
Member (A) Member (J)
ताज़ा खबरें - प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों की भर्ती सरकारी नौकरी - Army /Bank /CPSU /Defence /Faculty /Non-teaching /Police /PSC /Special recruitment drive /SSC /Stenographer /Teaching Jobs /Trainee / UPSC