7दिसम्बर , 24फरबरी , 24अगस्त के आदेशों का महत्वपूर्ण भाग : प्रशिक्षु शिक्षक चयन 2011

October 28, 2016

उत्तर प्रदेश बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद द्वारा संचालित परिषदीय विद्यालयों में 72,825 पदों पर "प्रशिक्षु शिक्षक चयन 2011" प्रक्रिया माननीय सर्वोच्य न्यायालय के आदेशों के अधीन गतिमान है।
इसीक्रम में माननीय सर्वोच्य न्यायालय में योजित याचिका संख्या CA4347-4375/2014 में 07/12/15, 24/02/16 व 24/08/16 में पारित हुए अंतरिम आदेशों के अनुपालन के सम्बन्ध में।

=> 7 दिसम्बर 2015 के आदेश का महत्वपूर्ण भाग...
It is submitted by Ms. K. Sharda Devi, learned counsel that the names of the appointees have not yet been put on the website. Mr. Vijay Bahadur Singh, learned Advocate General for the State of U.P. and Mr. Gaurav Bhatia, learned AAG undertake that the same shall be put on the website within a week hence.
At this juncture, we may state that Mr. Bhatia, learned AAG submitted that in pursuance of the direction of this Court on the earlier occasion and prior to that more than 75,000 representations were received and after scanning the same, the State Government has found 12,091 persons eligible for being appointed subject to verification of antecedents. Let the said persons be appointed subject to the said verification within six weeks hence.
At this juncture, Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel, Mr. Neeraj Jain, Mr. Siddharth Dave, Mr. Sanjay Hegde, Mr. Vikas Singh, Mr. Anand Nandan, Mr. Arvind Srivastava, Mr. Ajay Jain, Ms. Rachana Shrivastava, Mr. Avnish Singh, Mr. D.K. Tiwary, Mr. Rajiv Dubey, Ms. S. Janani, Mr. Ashok Kuamr Sharma and Mr. Manoj Prasad learned counsel submit that they represent approximately 1100 people and some arrangement should be made for them. On being asked, Mr. Vijay Bahadur Singh, learned Advocate General submitted that the State has no objection to offer them appointment on ad hoc basis subject to result of the special leave petitions. Let that be done within four weeks hence. Needless to say, no right shall accrue in their favour because of this order.
=> 24फरबरी2016 के आदेश का महत्वपूर्ण भाग...
In these interlocutory applications, the grievances which has been canvassed is issue that though they stand on the similar footing with the applicants which have been granted the benefit by the previous order dated 07.12.2015, the State has not considered their cases.
Let copies of the interlocutory applications be served on Mr. Gaurav Bhatia within a week hence. It is directed that the State shall consider the applicants in the said interlocutory applications or the names that find place in the said interlocutory applications on the parameters which were fixed on the last occasion. The said exercise shall be completed within ten weeks hence.
The competent authority of the State Government shall consider their cases individually on the parameters of the last order and submit a report. The report shall indicate the marks obtained by each of the candidates and also shall indicate how many persons would be eligible to be appointed on ad hoc basis.
=> 24अगस्त 2016 के आदेश का महत्वपूर्ण भाग...
This Court on 7.12.2015 and 24.2.2016 had passed certain interim orders. Learned counsel for the petitioners, who are the beneficiaries of the said orders, have raised the grievance that the orders passed by this Court have not yet been complied with by the State.
Mr. Dinesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel shall file an affidavit of the competent authority, preferably the Secretary of the Department concerned, how they are going to comply with them or is there any real difficulty in complying with them. Be it clarified, the stand of the State shall be addressed only at the time of final hearing.
Be it stated, in course of hearing we have found that a series of Interlocutory Applications seeking similar reliefs have been filed. Some of the learned counsel appearing for the parties submitted that regard being had to the earlier orders, especially order dated 24.02.2016, the matter shall be heard on merits.