69000 में कटऑफ लागू करवाने के पक्ष में रिफरेन्स और रुलिंग्स। दिए हुए अकाउंट में सहयोग कीजिये। ताकि सीनियर एडवोकेट को ले जा सकें अन्यथा SM को 25 भारांक के कारण टेट और 69000 फॉर्म के 1200₹ बेकार जाएंगे।
*69000 में कटऑफ लागू करवाने के पक्ष में रिफरेन्स और रुलिंग्स। दिए हुए अकाउंट में सहयोग कीजिये। ताकि सीनियर एडवोकेट को ले जा सकें अन्यथा SM को 25 भारांक के कारण टेट और 69000 फॉर्म के 1200₹ बेकार जाएंगे।*
.
.
1) Any executive instruction/order which runs counter to or is inconsistent with the statutory rules cannot be enforced, rather deserves to be quashed as having no force of law vide Ram Ganesh Tripathi v. State of U.P., AIR 1997 SC 1446
.
.
2) Executive instructions cannot amend or supersede the statutory rules or add something therein, nor the orders be issued in contravention of the statutory rules for the reason that an administrative instruction is not a statutory Rule nor does it have any force of law; while statutory rules have full force of law provided the same are not in conflict with the provisions of the Act vide
.
■ State of U. P. and Ors. v. Babu Ram Upadhyaya, AIR 1961 SC 751;
.
■ State of Tamil Nadu v. M/s. Hind Stone etc., AIR 1981 SC 711
.
.
3) If there is a conflict between the executive instruction and the Rules framed under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution, the Rules will prevail. Similarly, if there is a conflict in the Rules made under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution and the law, the law will prevail vide Union of India v. Sri Somasundaram Vishwanath, AIR 1988 SC 2255
.
.
4) Statutory rules create enforceable rights which cannot be taken away by issuing executive instructions vide
.
■ Union of India v. Rakesh Kumar, AIR 2001 SC 1877;
.
■ Swapan Kumar Pal and Ors. v. Samitabhar Chakraborty and Ors., AIR 2001 SC 2353;
.
■ Khet Singh v. Union of India, (2002) 4 SCC 380;
.
■ Laxminarayan R. Bhattad and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr., (2003) 5 SCC 413;
.
■ Delhi Development Authority v. Joginder S. Monga, (2004) 2 SCC 297
.
.
5) It is settled legal proposition that executive instructions cannot override the statutory provisions vide
.
■ B.N. Nagrajan v. State of Mysore, AIR 1966 SC 1942;
.
■ Sant Ram Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors., AIR 1967 SC 1910;
.
■ Union of India and Ors. v. Majji Jangammyya and Ors., AIR 1977 SC 757;
.
■ B.N. Nagarajan and Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors., AIR 1979 SC 1676;
.
■ P.D. Agrawal and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors., (1987) 3 SCC 622;
.
■ M/s. Beopar Sahayak (P) Ltd. and Ors. v. Vishwa Nath and Ors., AIR 1987 SC 2111;
.
■ State of Maharashtra v. Jagannath Achyut Karandikar, AIR 1989 SC 1133;
.
■ Paluru Ramkrishananiah and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors., AIR 1990 SC 166;
.
■ Comptroller and Auditor General of India and Ors. v. Mohan LalMalhotra and Ors., AIR.1991 SC 2288;
.
■ State of Madhya Pradesh v. G.S. Dall and Flour Mills, AIR 1991 SC 772;
.
■ Naga People's Movement of Human Rights v. Union of India and Ors., AIR 1998 SC 431;
.
■ C. Rangaswamaeah and Ors. v. Karnataka Lokayukta and Ors., AIR 1998 SC 96.
*69000 में कटऑफ लागू करवाने के पक्ष में रिफरेन्स और रुलिंग्स। दिए हुए अकाउंट में सहयोग कीजिये। ताकि सीनियर एडवोकेट को ले जा सकें अन्यथा SM को 25 भारांक के कारण टेट और 69000 फॉर्म के 1200₹ बेकार जाएंगे।*
.
1) Any executive instruction/order which runs counter to or is inconsistent with the statutory rules cannot be enforced, rather deserves to be quashed as having no force of law vide Ram Ganesh Tripathi v. State of U.P., AIR 1997 SC 1446
.
.
2) Executive instructions cannot amend or supersede the statutory rules or add something therein, nor the orders be issued in contravention of the statutory rules for the reason that an administrative instruction is not a statutory Rule nor does it have any force of law; while statutory rules have full force of law provided the same are not in conflict with the provisions of the Act vide
.
■ State of U. P. and Ors. v. Babu Ram Upadhyaya, AIR 1961 SC 751;
.
■ State of Tamil Nadu v. M/s. Hind Stone etc., AIR 1981 SC 711
.
.
3) If there is a conflict between the executive instruction and the Rules framed under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution, the Rules will prevail. Similarly, if there is a conflict in the Rules made under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution and the law, the law will prevail vide Union of India v. Sri Somasundaram Vishwanath, AIR 1988 SC 2255
.
.
4) Statutory rules create enforceable rights which cannot be taken away by issuing executive instructions vide
.
■ Union of India v. Rakesh Kumar, AIR 2001 SC 1877;
.
■ Swapan Kumar Pal and Ors. v. Samitabhar Chakraborty and Ors., AIR 2001 SC 2353;
.
■ Khet Singh v. Union of India, (2002) 4 SCC 380;
.
■ Laxminarayan R. Bhattad and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr., (2003) 5 SCC 413;
.
■ Delhi Development Authority v. Joginder S. Monga, (2004) 2 SCC 297
.
.
5) It is settled legal proposition that executive instructions cannot override the statutory provisions vide
.
■ B.N. Nagrajan v. State of Mysore, AIR 1966 SC 1942;
.
■ Sant Ram Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors., AIR 1967 SC 1910;
.
■ Union of India and Ors. v. Majji Jangammyya and Ors., AIR 1977 SC 757;
.
■ B.N. Nagarajan and Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors., AIR 1979 SC 1676;
.
■ P.D. Agrawal and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors., (1987) 3 SCC 622;
.
■ M/s. Beopar Sahayak (P) Ltd. and Ors. v. Vishwa Nath and Ors., AIR 1987 SC 2111;
.
■ State of Maharashtra v. Jagannath Achyut Karandikar, AIR 1989 SC 1133;
.
■ Paluru Ramkrishananiah and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors., AIR 1990 SC 166;
.
■ Comptroller and Auditor General of India and Ors. v. Mohan LalMalhotra and Ors., AIR.1991 SC 2288;
.
■ State of Madhya Pradesh v. G.S. Dall and Flour Mills, AIR 1991 SC 772;
.
■ Naga People's Movement of Human Rights v. Union of India and Ors., AIR 1998 SC 431;
.
■ C. Rangaswamaeah and Ors. v. Karnataka Lokayukta and Ors., AIR 1998 SC 96.